Key Takeaways
- Court litigation is public, time-consuming, and often costly — typically taking 18 months or more for resolution.
- Private arbitration offers confidentiality, speed, tailored arbitrator selection, and binding outcomes within weeks or months.
- Under Section 10L of the Family Law Act, arbitration is recognised, with court oversight available for awards.
- Arbitration is best suited for complex, high-asset cases, offering control over process and expertise; court remains essential for contested or child-related matters.
- Choosing the right pathway requires careful consideration of complexity, privacy, cost, control, and legal enforceability.
Settling Asset Disputes: Court or Arbitration?
When couples in Australia cannot resolve property division amicably, two paths emerge: traditional court proceedings or private/arbitrated resolution. Both serve to achieve asset division, but they differ dramatically in style, speed, cost, and confidentiality.
1. Court: The Traditional Route
Court proceedings — through the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia — are governed by set procedures, evidence rules, and public hearings. While court orders are final and enforceable, the process can be slow. For example, high-asset value (and sometime modest asset value) trials can take 18 months or longer to be heard by a judge, with an added three to twelve months to receive judgment.
Moreover, courts are typically public and adversarial. This transparency may benefit some, but many families prefer to keep sensitive financial details out of the public domain.
2. Private Arbitration: The Alternative
Arbitration provides a private, binding way to resolve property disputes. Parties agree on an arbitrator, usually a former judge or senior practitioner, and set custom timelines. Hearings can be completed in weeks, not months.
These arbitration awards are legally binding. Under Section 10L of the Family Law Act, the Family Court can oversee and formalise the award, making it enforceable.
Why Choose Arbitration?
Confidentiality & Privacy: Unlike court litigation, arbitration proceedings are held in private. Statements, evidence, and awards do not enter the public record.
Speed & Efficiency: Arbitration is designed for speed. Whereas court trials may take well over a year, arbitration can wrap up within mere weeks or months — delivering certainty faster.
Control and Expertise: Parties select the arbitrator, schedule hearings at convenient times, and define evidence procedures. This flexibility allows parties to tailor the process to their specific needs, often reducing stress and minimising conflict.
Cost-Effectiveness: Although there is a cost for arbitrators, overall expenses tend to be lower than lengthy court proceedings, thanks to the efficiency and absence of delays.
When Court Is Still Necessary
Arbitration isn’t a perfect fit for every scenario. Consider litigation when:
- There’s conflict involving child custody or parenting matters, which arbitration doesn’t address.
- One party refuses honest disclosure — court can compel transparency.
- You anticipate someone will want to appeal procedural errors, which is generally restricted in arbitration.
- Immediate injunctive relief is needed — like freezing assets or urgent orders.
Making the Right Choice
To decide between arbitration and court, evaluate:
- Complexity of assets: High-value estates often benefit from the expertise and speed of arbitration.
- Need for privacy: Arbitration keeps financial details confidential.
- Timing and cost priorities: If efficiency and speed matter, arbitration is preferable.
- Control over proceedings: Arbitration gives you control over arbitrator selection and scheduling.
- Enforceability and oversight: Court orders are enforceable – Arbitration awards may be made judgements and may become enforceable.
Final Word
For parties facing high-asset or complex property settlements, private arbitration offers significant advantages: confidentiality, speed, procedural control, and expert decision-making—all within a legally binding framework. Court remains indispensable when urgent legal powers are needed, or parenting disputes are involved.
If you’re considering asset division, speaking with a family lawyer experienced in both court and arbitration options is essential. It ensures your decision best matches your personal, financial, and family needs.
If you would like to discuss your Family Law matter with an expert, please contact me for a confidential consultation. My team and I are highly experienced in such matters.
Liability limited by a Scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
